Comments

3340: kneesocks

kneesocks // 799x931 // 95.7KB
- Reply
kuracsagnjurac: ALLAHU AKBAR HITLER WILL RISE AGAIN
- Reply
btl: @kuracsagnjurac: no

3335: botw wiiu

botw wiiu // 1280x720 // 484.6KB
- Reply
bapu: sushi

3289: to_love-ru_darkness

to_love-ru_darkness // 850x1202 // 113.1KB
- Reply
velkojaje: white nigga

3299: to_love-ru to_love-ru_darkness

to_love-ru to_love-ru_darkness // 850x1222 // 200.1KB
- Reply
velkojaje: dooooobre sise

3280: filipina

filipina // 600x800 // 37.8KB
- Reply
pita: test comment...

3275: Whatever_This_is

Whatever_This_is // 500x278 // 441.5KB
- Reply
Lalola: What the heck is this?

3258: all night open test.

all night open test. // 76x142 // 5.5KB
- Reply
Lalola: Cool

3255: eve

eve // 766x718 // 69.2KB
- Reply
bobalab: do you have a pgp key? i got something to tell you maybe you dont know. your code is being using onn a .onion website. very bad. contact me.

1735: bandwidth rule34

bandwidth rule34 // 603x246 // 30.7KB

- Reply
artanis: Yeah. I am not following the rule34 tag...
Unless it's the... no... can't be. :/

- Reply
Shish: This is the bandwidth graph for rule34.paheal.net -- It's quite possibly the most heavily used shimmie site, so I'm using it as a case study of how well shimmie can scale~
- Reply
Anonymous1: I have something like that in bw but a little less. My peak is 5.3mb. But not so many visits I'm pretty sure (the BW is high because the images are high-res prolly)

- Reply
artanis: I see, but since rule34 has its own meaning, tagging it rule34.paheal.net makes more sense.

Also, that site is disturbing.

- Reply
shuugo: Yeah some images are quite disturbing
- Reply
cyber: That is not that much actually, but I imagine now this site must be burning 20 times this at least. Can you post updated graph? XD
- Reply
test: @artanis: Old

1569: 2007 debconf

2007 debconf // 1224x1632 // 491.3KB
- Reply
cyber: That is mr. FreeBSD!
First | Prev | - | Next | Last
<< 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 >>